October 6, 2009
Posted: 1619 GMT


Hello everyone,

We are starting the show with Afghanistan and the decisions that need to be made quickly about what the mission is for international forces there. Once that decision is made, politicians in the United States will have to decide whether to send additional troops to the unstable country.

Today, U.S. President Barack Obama is meeting with lawmakers at the White House to talk about the Afghan war problem. Is the end goal to stabilize the country or is it only to neutralize Al Qaeda?

If it is the latter, then it is difficult to justify sending many more troops. If the mission is to stabilize and pacify Afghanistan, then more counter-insurgency help is needed, but also more money, more civilian advisors, more doctors, more engineers.

And a whole lot more money.

Will the United States decide that it is responsible for turning Afghanistan around? U.S. Vice President Joe Biden has signaled that the U.S. should pursue a narrower anti-terrorism campaign whose end goal is to defeat Al Qaeda.

But the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, has called a mission that doesn't support a wider pacification campaign is "short-sighted."

Meanwhile, the American Defense Secretary said yesterday at a Washington event co-hosted by Christiane Amanpour: "We're not leaving Afghanistan. There should be no uncertainty in terms of our determination to remain in Afghanistan and to continue to build a relationship of partnership and trust with the Pakistanis. That's long term. That's a strategic objective of the United States."

This very public debate in America over what to do in Afghanistan is consuming military and political leaders and the U.S. public, which is progressively withdrawing its support for the war.

We will look into all angles of this story today.

We will also report live on the floods in India, that have forced about a million people to flee the disaster area. Sara Sidner will join us at the IDesk.

Speaking of natural disasters, we are live in Indonesia with more on how earthquake survivors there are coping. Arwa Damon will join us. We will ask her if hospitals and rescue services are able to respond to the overwhelming needs of the wounded and the homeless.

We will also take you live to Istanbul, Baghdad, Wall Street and Rome.

Plus, Michael Holmes will join me at the IDesk for a special segment.

See you on TV!


Posted by: ,
Filed under: Today At The I-Desk

Share this on:
Elham   October 6th, 2009 5:23 pm ET


I noticed some changes about the wall on the show. Now I can see what´s going on on the wall ,much much better! Much clearer images on TV. I dont know exactly what you have done but you were successful !
Thank you all.

Topflight   October 6th, 2009 9:40 pm ET

It's of wonder to know top ranks of USA are becoming ever serious about already wartorn Afghanistan(USSR), whereas free radical Islamic terrorism from poorest part of world need not even scaresly be problem. Ground zero reality opposes earlier achievements of building skyscrapers. Question also stays except for decepted answers for who cares for future of innovative technology because todays gadgets seems ancient as though wrapped of stories from even older science fiction. Let us just pray to answer everlasted neverended tragedy of war between society who are accustomed for fulfilment of pleasures without leaving lap of luxury and society who invented ever new mechanisms leading to higher status.

john   October 7th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

It seems incomprehensible that no one seem to notice that by putting 40 K extra service men and women on the ground in Afghanistan, they also put 40 K more targets. The enemy is to a great extend local in one way or the other. They do not go away, they fade into the land / city scape and re-appear when they see it oportune hence the prolonged "battle".
To conquor that region has been tried for hundreds of years to no avail.
So more people on the ground will result in more fatalities.
Its sad when the old principles of " Reason, Objective, Recon., Planning, Action according to Plan and subsequent Victory, are clouded from the start by interests other than improvement of Civilasation and as such brings peril to young lives who die for " invalid reasons ".

Nnamdi   October 13th, 2009 8:50 pm ET

Sending more troops to Afghanistan is just an addition to the sacrificed lives the United States have already to put into the fight against the Taliban and its allies. The question isn't about if more or less troops are needed. The question is, " is that sacrifice worth it?"

Leave Your Comment


Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

International Desk brings viewers into the heart of the largest news gathering operation in the world. Viewers don't come here to watch the news; they come here to be immersed in it. To feel the rush of being the first to know what's happening as stories break, and to leave knowing they've gotten the best and latest information available. The show airs Mon-Fri at 1900 CET.

Powered by VIP